AUTHENTICITY IN, AND
OF THE ARTS
Who is to say what is authentic?
A dictionary definition of authenticity
is: "The condition of quality of being authentic,
trustworthy or genuine". Authentic
is "worthy of trust, reliance or belief".
Trustworthy is "warranting trust, dependable, reliable". Genuine
is as "authentic". If we
take the above and apply it to the Martial Arts, we can then say that an
art or system has authenticity if it
is worthy of trust, dependable, reliable and it is known the character
of the founder or producer.
Some say that a system has to be hundreds or thousands of years old
to be authentic. If that being the
case, where is the time where authenticity
ends and "counterfeits, fakes and artificiality" begin? Whenever
an individual takes an idea, modifies it and improves on it for the times
or their own purpose, is it a counterfeit or an original? Is the modern
day home, automobile or airplane a counterfeit of the first idea or is
it a much improved version?
Tae Kwon DO and Jeet Kune DO, to name a couple, are less than 50 years
old, but are they counterfeit or just another family from the same idea?
Tang Soo Do practitioners might say that they are more original. And then
you have Pankration and So on. How far back do you have to go? What about
Vajramushti? It goes much farther back than Bodhidharma (Daruma, Pu Ti
Ta Mo), so is Chuan Fa of the Shaolin Temple a counterfeit?
I really do not believe that it is the age of a system that makes it
"authentic", but of the usable
and effective value of a system built upon the tradition by which the original
idea was born or developed. As with Tae Kwon Do, it has become a well recognized
and respected martial art that is relatively new. So, whether a system
is 1500 years old or 40 years old, it doesn't matter as long as it is functional
and accepted by the populous as workable and effective. Some of the older
systems are beginning to conform to more modern ideas, but is that to say
that they are no longer authentic?
I believe that if a system is able to compete against another system with
positive results, it is worthy of acceptance and of being authentic
in its design.
An excerpt from my book: "Reflections of a Master Instructor"
Dennis L. Wissler
E-mail to: wtv@infocom.com